[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4720C42B.7010303@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:28:27 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic
runtime service support
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
>> EFI runtime
>> services initialization are implemented in efi.c. Some x86_64
>> specifics are worth noting here. On x86_64, parameters passed to UEFI
>> firmware services need to follow the UEFI calling convention. For this
>> purpose, a set of functions named lin2win<x> (<x> is the number of
>> parameters) are implemented. EFI function calls are wrapped before
>> calling the firmware service.
>
> Why needs this to be called lin2win? We do not call Windows, we call
> EFI services, so please use a naming convention which is related to
> the functionality of the code.
>
Well, presumably EFI inherited the calling convention (as well as
another bunch of stupidity) from that corner.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists