[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710251855510.3186@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:56:52 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, "Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [2.6 patch] unexport tick_nohz_get_sleep_length
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >> This patch removes the unused
> >> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> f7c83dfe117f4fd072b2506ae090e4145abda362
> >> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> >> index 10a1347..5997456 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> >> @@ -320,8 +320,6 @@ ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void)
> >> return ts->sleep_length;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_get_sleep_length);
> >> -
> >
> >Hmm, this was added to allow the cpuidle governers modular
> >build. Seems this was changed to compiled in only.
> >
> >Len, Venki, is this the final decision ?
> >
>
> Yes. This was done recently for proper fallback to old ACPI policy in
> case CPUIDLE is not selected. With that being module, falling back to
> ACPI policy at run time makes things ugly.
Makes sense. I go ahead and nuke the export.
Thanks,
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists