| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m1ir4v5dk3.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:06:36 -0600 From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pjones@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic runtime service support Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> writes: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:55:44 -0600 > ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > >> I don't think there is a compelling case for us to use any efi >> services at this time > > I would almost agree with this if it wasn't for the 1 call that OS > installers need to tell EFI about bootloader stuff; I've cc'd Peter > Jones since he'll know better what OS installers need; if they don't > need it after all... Yes. I think that is usage of the variable service. Although I don't know if that is actually needed. Support for the variable service is not implemented in this patchset. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists