linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 10:58:11 -0700
From:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>
To:	vgoyal@...ibm.com
Cc:	hbabu@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] x86: unify crash_32/64.c

Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:18:27PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I made patches to unify crash_32/64.c.
>>> There are three patches;
>>> 1. add lapic_shutdown for x86_64
>>> 2. add safe_smp_processor_id for x86_64
>>> 3. unify crash_32/64.c
>>>
>>> I'm not sure that it's good to split to these patches.
>>>
>>> I've compiled on both of 32bit and 64bit, and tested
>>> kdump on 64bit.
>>>
>> Hi Hiroshi,
>>
>> Thanks for the patches. Can you please also test it on 32bit to make
>> sure nothing is broken.
> 
> Okay, I'll test it on 32bit.
> A build problem already has been found on 32bit.
> 
I'm now testing crash on 32bit, but there is an issue before
applying the patches. My machine stopped at checking 'hlt'
after kexec, showing below message.

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.80GHz stepping 0a
Checking 'hlt' instruction...

v2.6.23.1 works fine for 1st kernel.
I'm investigating it..

Thanks
Hiroshi Shimamoto
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/