[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071025183352.GB2176@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:33:52 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
matthew@....cx, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
viro@....linux.org.uk, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
adobriyan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB HCD: avoid duplicate local_irq_disable()
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 12:01:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() has a retry loop that starts with a spin_lock_irq(),
> > but only gives up the spinlock, not the irq_disable before jumping to the
> > rescan label.
> >
> > Split the spin_lock_irq into the retryable part and the local_irq_disable()
> > that is only done once as a micro-optimization and slight cleanup.
>
> I agree with your sentiment, but it would be better to solve this
> problem without using local_irq_disable(). The patch below does this.
>
> ---
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Alan, is this something you want added to the tree and in before 2.6.24
is out?
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists