[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47200826.1060801@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:06:14 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
CC: Jie Zhang <jzhang.linux@...il.com>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
bryan.wu@...log.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] blackfin: "extern inline" -> "static inline"
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 10/24/07, Jie Zhang <jzhang.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>> On 10/25/07, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> "extern inline" will have different semantics with gcc 4.3.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
>>>
>>> --- a/include/asm-blackfin/string.h
>>> +++ b/include/asm-blackfin/string.h
>>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>>> #ifdef __KERNEL__ /* only set these up for kernel code */
>>>
>>> #define __HAVE_ARCH_STRCPY
>>> -extern inline char *strcpy(char *dest, const char *src)
>>> +static inline char *strcpy(char *dest, const char *src)
>>> {
>>> char *xdest = dest;
>>> char temp = 0;
>> What if we compile it with gcc 4.1?
>
> we'll have to either use the gcc attributes to force old inline
> behavior or use the gcc flag to force it
We should probably have an extern_inline define then, assuming this is a
function that does exist in a linkable version already -- otherwise
"static inline" is correct.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists