linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: do not call ->pm() on initialization for console port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071025134044.58ca9d35.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:40:44 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc:	rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: do not call ->pm() on initialization for
 console port

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 01:05:10 +0900 (JST)
Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 17:18:27 +0100, Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > > Attached patch fixes this problem.  Is this a right way?
> > > If not, I will fix the serial_txx9 driver to skip the initialization in
> > > ->pm() if oldstate was -1.
> > 
> > I'll have to investigate further to refresh myself with what's going
> > on here, but your patch looks wrong.
> 
> Now rc1 is released.  Any chances for this patch?
> If none, I should push other workaround to fix this issue on 2.6.24.

I don't know what patch you're referring to.  I don't appear to have
whatever-patch-this-is queued up anywhere?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/