linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071024203113.615682a4.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:31:13 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Use macros instead of TASK_ flags

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 08:24:55 -0400 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> wrote:

> Abstracting away direct uses of TASK_ flags allows us to change the
> definitions of the task flags more easily.
> 
> Also restructure do_wait() a little

umm, spose so.

There's an excellent chance that a millionth of our monkeys will come
along and wreck this diff during the next two months.  In which case
I might end up dropping bits of it, we'll see.

It would be much better if this patch was a series of patches: one to add
the new infrastructure and one-per-subsystem to introduce users of the
infrastructure.  That way I wouldn't have to go mucking around in the
internals of the patch and remembering to tell you when I tossed bits of it
out, and which bits those were.

This shouldn't come as news to an old-timer :(
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/