[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <472120F6.2080703@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:04:22 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
CC: Ismail Dönmez <ismail@...dus.org.tr>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kleen, Andi" <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ismail Dönmez wrote:
>> Thursday 25 October 2007 Tarihinde 17:55:00 yazmıştı:
>>> I think the OpenBSD people decided to actually do something about this,
>>> and I suspect it had *nothing* to do with license issues, and everything
>>> to do with these kinds of problems. I wish them all the luck, although
>>> personally I think LLVM is a much more interesting project.
>>
>> And on the LLVM side all hopes for clang [0] at least for better C++
>> error reporting ;-)
>>
>> [0] http://clang.llvm.org/
>
> Someone should take 'sparse' and use that as a C language front-end to
> LLVM...
Among clang's "features":
"A single unified parser for C/ObjC/C++"
bleh. I cannot imagine how ugly a C parser gets, after being taught
C++. IMO since you can basically redefine everything in C++, it's not a
language but a proto-language.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists