[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071024205723.458fab97.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:57:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: trenn@...e.de
Cc: linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Detect hwmon and i2c bus drivers interfering with
ACPI Operation Region resources
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:31:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de> wrote:
> it seems Len's test tree and Linus tree diverged a bit, at least with
> this patch set things do not apply cleanly.
>
> Therefore I post these for discussion whether and in which kernel tree
> they should end up before doing work for nothing.
> If they are still a candidate for 2.6.24 (rather unintrusive), pls tell
> me whether and when I should base them against Len's test/release branch
> or whatever other tree.
> If not, it would be great if they can be included into the -mm tree and
> I can rebase them against this one.
I staged the three acpi patches against Len's tree and I staged the hwmon
patch against Mark's tree and I staged the I2C patch against Jean's tree.
This means that if/when the ACPI patches have gone me->Len->Linus, I can
send the I2C patch to Jean and the hwmon patch to Mark and we're all good.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists