[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193360591.23935.212.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 09:03:11 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic
runtime service support
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 18:09 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > EFI runtime
> > services initialization are implemented in efi.c. Some x86_64
> > specifics are worth noting here. On x86_64, parameters passed to UEFI
> > firmware services need to follow the UEFI calling convention. For this
> > purpose, a set of functions named lin2win<x> (<x> is the number of
> > parameters) are implemented. EFI function calls are wrapped before
> > calling the firmware service.
>
> Why needs this to be called lin2win? We do not call Windows, we call
> EFI services, so please use a naming convention which is related to
> the functionality of the code.
>
> > + *
> > + * Function calling ABI conversion from SYSV to Windows for x86_64
>
> Again, these are wrappers to access EFI and not Windows.
EFI uses the Windows x86_64 calling convention. The lin2win may be a
more general naming convention that can be used for some other code (the
NDISwrapper?) in the future. Do you agree?
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists