[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710261804.29136.wangbj@lzu.edu.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:04:26 +0800
From: "Wang, Baojun" <wangbj@....edu.cn>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kernel 2.6.23 CFS problem?
On Friday 26 October 2007 17:05:42, you wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:32 +0800, Wang, Baojun wrote:
> > > Perhaps he has any tasks stuck in 'D' state? If so, SysRq-t output for
> > > these would be a good thing to collect. What leads him to suspect the
> > > process scheduler, etc. More details are needed.
> >
> > The task is S+ state, please see in the attachment tarball, SysRq-t
> > output has also been attached, I wish it would help. I doubt it's the CFS
> > problem because it's first introduced into the 2.6.23 kernel.
>
> (yeah, but there were a truckload of other changes as well)
>
> Looking at your data, _my_ first suspect would be the 2.6.22->2.6.23
> futex changes. I'd revert all of the changes to kernel/futex.c and
> kernel/futex_compat.c, and see if the problem went away. If it didn't,
> I'd then do a full git bisect to nail it down.
>
> -Mike
Thanks very much, also my glibc (2.6.1) is built under 2.6.23 (but not
linux-headers, which is 2.6.22). but I've tried right now (install ELDK4.1)
on another x86_64 machine, without any problem (x86_64, Core2Duo E6600, 4G
RAM)
Wang
--
Wang, Baojun Lanzhou University
Distributed & Embedded System Lab http://dslab.lzu.edu.cn
School of Information Science and Engeneering wangbj@....edu.cn
Tianshui South Road 222. Lanzhou 730000 .P.R.China
Tel:+86-931-8912025 Fax:+86-931-8912022
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists