[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.0.9999.0710261210290.3186@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:20:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic
runtime service support
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Huang, Ying wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 10:48 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > EFI uses the Windows x86_64 calling convention. The lin2win may be a
> > > more general naming convention that can be used for some other code (the
> > > NDISwrapper?) in the future. Do you agree?
> >
> > I agree not at all. I do not care whether the EFI creators smoked the
> > Windows-crackpipe or some other hallucinogen when they decided to use
> > this calling convention. We definitely do not want to think about
> > NDISwrapper or any other Windows related hackery in the kernel.
>
> OK, I will change the name to something like lin2efi.
Can we simply use call_efi_XXX(). lin2efi() sounds like a conversion
routine, but it is not.
tglx
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists