[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071026112307.GA30406@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:23:07 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: aim7 -30% regression in 2.6.24-rc1
* Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> I tested 2.6.24-rc1 on my x86_64 machine which has 2 quad-core processors.
>
> Comparing with 2.6.23, aim7 has about -30% regression. I did a bisect
> and found patch
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=b5869ce7f68b233ceb81465a7644be0d9a5f3dbb
> caused the issue.
weird, that's a commit diff - i.e. it changes no code.
> kbuild/SPECjbb2000/SPECjbb2005 also has big regressions. On my another
> tigerton machine (4 quad-core processors), SPECjbb2005 has more than
> -40% regression. I didn't do a bisect on such benchmark testing, but I
> suspect the root cause is like aim7's.
these two commits might be relevant:
7a6c6bcee029a978f866511d6e41dbc7301fde4c
95dbb421d12fdd9796ed153853daf3679809274f
but a bisection result would be the best info.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists