[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3r6jighjl.fsf@ursa.amorsen.dk>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:57:18 +0200
From: Benny Amorsen <benny+usenet@...rsen.dk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IRQ off latency of printk is very high
>>>>> "MM" == Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com> writes:
MM> Well there are things we can do, yes, but I'd be worried that
MM> they've give up the deterministic behavior we rely on quite
MM> heavily for debugging. If event A happens before event B, we must
MM> see the message from A before the one from B, even if B happens in
MM> irq context.
MM> And if event B is a hard lock up, we'd also like to be sure the
MM> message for A actually gets out. If B happens in the interrupt
MM> that comes in when we re-enable them, that won't happen.
I can see the concerns, but right now it all leads to disabling serial
console for real-time servers. That is even less helpful for
debugging.
/Benny
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists