| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:40:38 +0200 From: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com> To: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? On 10/25/07, Linus Torvalds <> wrote: > The gcc developers seem to have had a total disregard for what people > want or need, and every time some code generation issue comes up, there's > a lot of people on the list that do language-lawyering, rather than admit > that there might be a problem. Please make a proposal for how gcc should be modified instead of just shooting on the gcc people -- the root cause here is the way the C/C++ memory model is defined. (Note: I'm not in any way involved in gcc development.) You can find my proposal to improve gcc here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2007-10/msg00465.html Bart Van Assche. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists