linux-kernel - Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:10:51 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...il.com>, greg@...ah.com,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Subject: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)

On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 16:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> I appreciate the sysfs people their opinion that /sys/bdi/ might not be the
> best from their POV, however I'm not seeing where to hook the BDI object from
> so that it all makes sense, a few of the things are currently not exposed in
> sysfs at all, like the NFS and FUSE things.

What happended to the idea to create a "bdi" class, and have the
existing devices as parents, and for stuff that is not (not now, or
never) in sysfs, no parent is set.

Thanks,
Kay

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/