lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <18210.2314.57767.962503@zebedee.pink> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:34:34 +0100 From: Andrew Haley <aph@...hat.com> To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? Linus Torvalds writes: > So my basic worry about gcc is in fact none of the individual > technical problems themselves - those can be fixed. No, the problem > I've seen in gcc is that _some_ of the developers seem to be total > d*ckheads when it comes to "language definition", and seem to think > that it's more important to read the language spec like a lawyer > than it is to solve actual user problems. Well, yeah. I know what you mean. However, at this moment, some gcc developers are trying really hard not to be total d*ckheads about this issue, but get gcc fixed. Give us a chance. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists