lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <472216A5.8070908@simon.arlott.org.uk> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:32:37 +0100 From: Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu> To: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org> CC: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>, Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>, Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@...ian.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface) On 26/10/07 16:58, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:46:39AM +0200, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:56:47 -0700, Greg KH wrote: >> > I'm trying to compile a list of all known external modules and drivers >> > and work to get them included in the main kernel tree to help prevent >> > these kinds of things. If you know of any that are not on the list at: >> > http://linuxdriverproject.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/OutOfTreeDrivers >> > please feel free to add them, or email me with the needed information >> > and I will add them to the list. >> >> That's certainly helpful, but I still think there will always be >> a number of external modules that cannot be merged right now or at >> all, and deliberately making life difficult for out-of-tree code >> maintainers in order to coerce them into submitting their code for >> inclusion in the kernel will not work, it'll only create bad >> feelings. > > Do you have examples of proof of this? Read > Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt for how we already make > out-of-tree code developer's lives hell :) The change makes it much harder to develop in tree too. Also, this really needs to be reverted and put in the feature removal schedule... unless you intend to deliberately make all out of tree LSMs unusable with no warning and no time to have them added to the kernel? We're already at 2.6.24-rc1. -- Simon Arlott - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists