lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <18210.8170.598519.439148@zebedee.pink> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:12:10 +0100 From: Andrew Haley <aph@...hat.com> To: "Bart Van Assche" <bart.vanassche@...il.com> Cc: "Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Is gcc thread-unsafe? Bart Van Assche writes: > Andrew, do you know whether gcc currently contains any optimization > that interchanges the order of accesses to non-volatile variables > and function calls ? It sure does. Andrew. -- Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, UK Registered in England and Wales No. 3798903 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists