lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47222AFA.9030902@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:59:22 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...ibm.com>, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check. Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > Both x86 and x86_64 support the same boot protocol so we need > to implement the KEEP_SEGMENTS on x86_64 as well. It isn't > just paravirt bootloaders that could use this functionality. > Out of curiousity, what other users do you see? -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists