[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.0.9999.0710261145400.11674@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>
cc: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> Actually, my patch doesn't change the set_mempolicy() API at all, it
> just co-opts a currently unused/illegal value for the nodemask to
> indicate "all allowed nodes". Again, I need to provide a libnuma API to
> request this. Soon come, mon...
>
If something that was previously unaccepted is now allowed with a
newly-introduced semantic, that's an API change.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists