lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20071026120216.0411e7c0.pj@sgi.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:02:16 -0700 From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option David wrote: > I personally prefer an approach where cpusets take the responsibility for > determining how policies change (they use set_mempolicy() anyway to effect > their mems boundaries) because it's cpusets that has changed the available > nodemask out from beneath the application. Agreed. -- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists