[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071026120216.0411e7c0.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:02:16 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, clameter@....com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
David wrote:
> I personally prefer an approach where cpusets take the responsibility for
> determining how policies change (they use set_mempolicy() anyway to effect
> their mems boundaries) because it's cpusets that has changed the available
> nodemask out from beneath the application.
Agreed.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists