linux-kernel - Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071026131510.52955c54@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:15:10 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To:	John Johansen <jjohansen@...e.de>
Cc:	jjohansen@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview

On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:34:48 -0700
John Johansen <jjohansen@...e.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:37:21AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:40:24 -0700
> > jjohansen@...e.de wrote:
> > 
> > before going into the LSM / security side of things, I'd like to get
> > the VFS guys to look at your VFS interaction code.
> > 
> yes, the vfs interaction definitely need their review.
> 
> > In addition, I'd like to ask you to put a file in Documentation/
> > somewhere that describes what AppArmor is intended security
> > protection is (it's different from SELinux for sure for example);
> > by having such a document for each LSM user, end users and distros
> > can make a more informed decision which module suits their
> > requirements... and it also makes it possible to look at the
> > implementation to see if it has gaps to the intent, without getting
> > into a pissing contest about which security model is better; but
> > unless the security goals are explicitly described that's a trap
> > that will keep coming back... so please spend some time on getting
> > a good description going here..
> > 
> yes this is needed and a good idea in general
> 

would you mind posting your first stab at this to the list shortly,
because without that it's nearly impossible to review your patchkit in
a sensible way...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/