[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710262356.06562.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 23:56:06 +0200
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
Cc: jjohansen@...e.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 32/45] Enable LSM hooks to distinguish operations on file descriptors from operations on pathnames
On Friday 26 October 2007 22:58:11 Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> For special files, f_op->fsetattr will be NULL, since
> init_special_inode() will set up i_fop that way.
>
> So the filesystem's fsetattr() will only be called for regular files
> and/or directories, depending on how it sets up i_fop.
>
> With the ia_file thing, the filesystem would receive the struct file
> pointer in all cases. So the posted patch would break AFS and FUSE,
> because they unconditionally use ia_file if available and don't check
> the file type.
Ah okay, that's what you mean. That's much cleaner than ia_file indeed.
> They could check the file type, but still the interface would be ugly.
Agreed, that would be ugly.
> Ah, so if we kept ATTR_FILE and got rid of iattr_file, would that be OK
> for AppArmor?
No problem, yes.
Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists