lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1193364873.23935.248.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:14:33 +0800 From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pjones@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic runtime service support On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >>> > >> Ying claimed that GOP requires EFI runtime services. Is that not true? > > > > None of the EFI framebuffer patches that I saw used EFI runtime services. > > > > Ying, could you please clarify this situation? > > (Eric: do note that there are two EFI framebuffer standard, UGA and GOP. > Apparently UGA is obsolete and we have always been at war with GOP at > the moment.) EFI framebuffer doesn't depend on EFI runtime service. It only depends on kernel boot parameters (screen_info). Best Regards, Huang Ying - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists