[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1193364873.23935.248.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 10:14:33 +0800
From: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, pjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3 -v4] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI basic
runtime service support
On Thu, 2007-10-25 at 13:36 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>>
> >> Ying claimed that GOP requires EFI runtime services. Is that not true?
> >
> > None of the EFI framebuffer patches that I saw used EFI runtime services.
> >
>
> Ying, could you please clarify this situation?
>
> (Eric: do note that there are two EFI framebuffer standard, UGA and GOP.
> Apparently UGA is obsolete and we have always been at war with GOP at
> the moment.)
EFI framebuffer doesn't depend on EFI runtime service. It only depends
on kernel boot parameters (screen_info).
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists