lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47227C5C.1070507@hp.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:46:36 -0700 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, bunk@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] always export sysctl_{r,w}mem_max David Miller wrote: > If DLM really wants minimum, it can use SO_SNDBUFFORCE and > SO_RCVBUFFORCE socket options and use whatever limits it > likes. > > But even this is questionable. Drift... Is that something netperf should be using though? Right now it uses the regular SO_[SND|RCV]BUF calls and is at the mercy of sysctls. I wonder if it would be better to have it use their FORCE versions to make life easier on the benchmarker - such as myself - who has an unfortunate habit of forgetting to update sysctl.conf :) rick jones - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists