[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071025213415.e08d85d5.pj@sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 21:34:15 -0700
From: Paul Jackson <pj@....com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, ak@...e.de,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option
David wrote:
> I think that documenting the change in the man page as saying that
> "the nodemask will include all allowed nodes if the mems_allowed
> of a memory_spread_user cpuset is expanded" is better.
Ok. I'm inclined the other way, but not certain enough of my
position to push the point any further.
Good enough.
> I've got a few fixes for my patchset queued so I'll resend it later
Ok. Good work - thanks.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@....com> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists