linux-kernel - Re: [linux-pm] QUESTION: How to fix race between .suspend routine and watchdog timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200710272119.44574.maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Oct 2007 21:19:44 +0200
From:	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] QUESTION: How to fix race between .suspend routine and watchdog timer

On Saturday 27 October 2007 21:17:55 Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> 
> > > > Looking through the dmfe code, I noticed yet another possible race.
> > > > A race between the .suspend, and a timer that serves both as a watchdog, and link state detector.
> > > > Again I need to prevent it from running during the suspend/resume, but how?
> > > > 
> > > > I can use del_timer in .suspend, and mod_timer in .resume, but that doesn't protect against
> > > > race with already running timer.
> > > > I can use del_timer_sync, but it states that it is useless if timer re-enables itself, and I agree with that.
> > > > In dmfe case the timer does re-enable itself.
> > > 
> > > That comment isn't right.  del_timer_sync works perfectly well even if
> > > the timer routine re-enables itself, provided it stops doing so after a
> > > small number of iterations.
> > Thanks for the info. but....
> > Due to the "don't access the hardware, while powered-off" rule, I must know that the timer isn't running.
> > and won't be.
> > So what function to use (if possible) to be sure that the timer won't run anymore?
> > (Taking in the account the fact that it re-enables itself)
> 
> Use del_timer_sync().  It guarantees that when it returns, the timer 
> will be stopped and the timer routine will no longer be running on any 
> CPU.
> 
Even if the timer re-enables itself, are you sure?

> Alan Stern
> 
> 

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/