[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071027195025.GA3263@zarina>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 23:50:25 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...l.ru>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrey Borzenkov <arvidjaar@...l.ru>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davidz@...hat.com, rhughes@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc1: ensure "present" sysfs attribute even if
battery is absent
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 03:32:04PM -0400, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 22:42 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > Well, PROP_PRESENT wasn't my idea, currently it's used by pmu and
> > olpc drivers becuase it's not trivial to register/unregister their
> > batteries on physical insertion/removal. I have some plans to teach
> > at least pmu batteries to not use PROP_PRESENT. I don't have any
> > OLPC, thus I can't convert it.
>
> Actually it's not hard to do that.
I didn't say it's hard. But we don't have any interrupts for the
battery events, thus we have to implement polling.
> It was done this way in response to a
> request from the userspace side. IIRC.
Oh. Userspace tried to do something weird then, I think. Generally
it's just sane to unregister absent hardware.
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbou@...l.ru
backup email: ya-cbou@...dex.ru
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists