[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071026205009.24ec2d83.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:50:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh@...e.de, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fix typo in SubmittingPatches
On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:51:44 +0900 Keiichi KII wrote:
> From: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com>
>
> Fix typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keiichi Kii <k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
> ---
> Index: trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> ===================================================================
> --- trunk.orig/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> +++ trunk/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
> @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ section Linus Computer Science 101.
> Nuff said. If your code deviates too much from this, it is likely
> to be rejected without further review, and without comment.
>
> -Once significant exception is when moving code from one file to
> +One significant exception is when moving code from one file to
> another in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in
> the same patch which moves it. This clearly delineates the act of
> moving the code and your changes. This greatly aids review of the
That first sentence is still broken. It should be more like this,
with either a ":" or ";" or " -- " between clauses:
One significant exception is when moving code from one file to
another -- in this case you should not modify the moved code at all in
the same patch which moves it.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists