[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071027083011.GA21273@rain>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 12:30:11 +0400
From: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
satyam@...radead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 106/327] ufs: Fix mount check in ufs_fill_super()
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 11:26:53PM -0700, akpm@...ux-foundation.org wrote:
> From: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
>
> The current code skips the check to verify whether the filesystem was
> previously cleanly unmounted, if (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD or
> UFS_ST_OLD. This looks like an inadvertent bug that slipped in due to
> parantheses in the compound conditional to me, especially given that
> ufs_get_fs_state() handles the UFS_ST_44BSD case perfectly well. So, let's
> fix the compound condition appropriately.
>
I wonder on what type of UFS do you test this patch?
NetBSD and FreeBSD do not use "fs_state", they use "fs_clean" flag,
only Solaris does check like this: fs_state + fs_time == FSOK.
That's why parentheses was like that.
At now with linux-2.6.24-rc1-git1, I get: fs need fsck,
but NetBSD's fsck says that's all ok.
I suggest revert this patch.
> Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <satyam@...radead.org>
> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@...l.ru>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> fs/ufs/super.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN fs/ufs/super.c~ufs-fix-sun-state-fix-mount-check-in-ufs_fill_super fs/ufs/super.c
> --- a/fs/ufs/super.c~ufs-fix-sun-state-fix-mount-check-in-ufs_fill_super
> +++ a/fs/ufs/super.c
> @@ -933,19 +933,20 @@ magic_found:
> goto again;
> }
>
> - sbi->s_flags = flags;/*after that line some functions use s_flags*/
> + /* Set sbi->s_flags here, used by ufs_get_fs_state() below */
> + sbi->s_flags = flags;
> ufs_print_super_stuff(sb, usb1, usb2, usb3);
>
> /*
> * Check, if file system was correctly unmounted.
> * If not, make it read only.
> */
> - if (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) ||
> - ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) ||
> - (((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN ||
> - (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS ||
> - (flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86) &&
> - (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time))))) {
> + if ((((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_44BSD) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_OLD) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUN) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNOS) ||
> + ((flags & UFS_ST_MASK) == UFS_ST_SUNx86)) &&
> + (ufs_get_fs_state(sb, usb1, usb3) == (UFS_FSOK - fs32_to_cpu(sb, usb1->fs_time)))) {
> switch(usb1->fs_clean) {
> case UFS_FSCLEAN:
> UFSD("fs is clean\n");
> _
--
/Evgeniy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists