[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4724B4F2.7070500@goop.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 09:12:34 -0700
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>, Kir Kolyshkin <kir@...oft.com>,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
kir@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [Devel] [PATCH] pidns: Place under CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL (take
2)
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Roughly that sounds like CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL to me. But I would
> be happy to hear if someone has a better idea.
>
Rather than overload an existing config option, why not add one with the
specific semantics you want: CONFIG_UNSTABLE_UABI. The problem seems
like one which which may occur again, though one hopes not too often. I
guess the risk is that people will leave their subsystems depending on
it permanently (sysfs?), so it ends up being set all the time and
becomes as useless as EXPERIMENTAL...
J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists