[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4724E63F.2030600@imap.cc>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 20:42:55 +0100
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
Simon Arlott <simon@...e.lp0.eu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>,
Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@...oo.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Crispin Cowan <crispin@...spincowan.com>,
Giacomo Catenazzi <cate@...ian.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework
Am 27.10.2007 20:22 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> Hi!
>
>> but require unreasonable interface changes. As people who care
>> about security (y'all who are only from the LKML are excused) it
>> is our obligation to look beyond the preconceived notions of what
>> is and isn't secure. Security is subjective. It's how you feel
>> about it.
>
> <sarcasm>Hmm. So lets add automagic security module. It magically fixes
> security holes, and you can feel good about it.</sarcasm>
Send patch.
--
Tilman Schmidt E-Mail: tilman@...p.cc
Bonn, Germany
Diese Nachricht besteht zu 100% aus wiederverwerteten Bits.
Ungeöffnet mindestens haltbar bis: (siehe Rückseite)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (254 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists