linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Fujitsu application panel driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:30:15 -0400
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...ightbb.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-input@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fujitsu application panel driver

Hi Stephen,

On Tuesday 23 October 2007 15:55, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> +
> +static int apanel_setkeycode(struct input_dev *idev, int scancode, int keycode)
> +{
> +	struct apanel *ap = idev->private;
> +
> +	if (keycode < 0 || keycode > KEY_MAX)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (scancode < 0 || scancode >= MAX_PANEL_KEYS)
> +		return -EINVAL;

scancode >= idev->keycodemax is prbably better here - we don't want to
allow setting keycode for unsupported buttons.

> +
> +	clear_bit(ap->keymap[scancode], idev->keybit);

This will not work if one has same code assigned to 2 buttons. Pretty
degenerate case, I know...

> +	ap->keymap[scancode] = keycode;
> +	set_bit(keycode, idev->keybit);
> +	return 0;
> +}

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/