[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47243E3F.9060307@vc.cvut.cz>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 00:46:07 -0700
From: Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@...cvut.cz>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, sfrench@...ba.org,
jaharkes@...cmu.edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Networked filesystems vs backing_dev_info
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 23:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> So in short, stick a struct backing_dev_info into whatever represents a
>> client, initialize it using bdi_init(), destroy using bdi_destroy().
>
> Oh, and the most important point, make your fresh I_NEW inodes point to
> this bdi struct.
>
>> Mark it congested once you have 50 (or more) outstanding requests, clear
>> congestion when you drop below 50.
>> and you should be set.
Thanks. Unfortunately I do not think that NCPFS will switch to
backing_dev_info - it uses pagecache only for symlinks and directories,
and even if it would use pagecache, as most of servers refuse concurrent
requests even if TCP is used as a transport, there can be only one
request in flight...
Petr
P.S.: And if anyone wants to step in as ncpfs maintainer, feel free. I
did not see NetWare server for over year now...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists