[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710281525.11245.agruen@suse.de>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:25:10 +0100
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, jjohansen@...e.de,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [AppArmor 00/45] AppArmor security module overview
On Saturday 27 October 2007 22:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 07:37:21AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > before going into the LSM / security side of things, I'd like to get
> > the VFS guys to look at your VFS interaction code.
>
> It's been NACKed a few times, and just reposting it won't help.
Let me repeat what I have said before in another context. The past discussions
on linux-kernel were useful for a while, and we got constructive feedback
which we could act upon, but then the feedback became very non-constructive
again, and you NACKed patches without giving any good reasons. I have asked
for specific feedback but didn't get any in:
- Rejecting the vfsmount additions,
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118350187712375
- VFS layering fuck-up accusation,
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=118348050804600
So can we pick up things there again, and have a real discussion about the
things you criticize?
Thanks,
Andreas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists