linux-kernel - Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071029080822.6f04194c@the-village.bc.nu>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:08:22 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"George G. Davis" <gdavis@...sta.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH] locks: remove posix deadlock detection

> And if posix file locks are to be useful to threaded applications, then
> we have to preserve the same no-false-positives requirement for them as
> well.

It isn't useful to threaded applications. The specification requires
this. Which is another reason for having an additional Linux (for now)
flag to say "don't bother"

Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/