lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071028.181759.148922611.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2007 18:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2007 23:51:55 +0100

> Subject		: Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are not propagated. via sysctl too
> Submitter	: Serge van den Boom <svdb+linux-kernel-bugs@...ck.nl>
> References	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224
> Handled-By	: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>

I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has
existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it
doesn't belong on the regression list.

The bug reporter says something that drives me a little batty, which
is probably what got this onto the regression list.  He says "2.6.22
(not sure)" as the most recent kernel where the problem didn't occur.

People should list no version at all if they don't know, otherwise
we'll just get more bogons on the regression list.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists