| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071029114048.GA22599@elte.hu> Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:40:48 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1: First impressions * Martin Knoblauch <knobi@...bisoft.de> wrote: > One of the reasons I do 15 GB transfers is to make sure that I am > well above the possible page cache size. And of course I am doing a > final sync to finish the runs :-) The sync is also running faster in > 2.6.24-rc1. > > If I factor it in the results for dd1/dd3 are: > > test 2.6.19.2 2.6.22.6 2.6.24-rc1 > sync time 18sec 19sec 6sec > dd1 27.5 47.5 92 > dd3 3x9.1 3x8.5 3x29 > > So basically including the sync time make 2.6.24-rc1 even more > promosing. Now, I know that my benchmarks numbers are crude and show > only a very small aspect of system performance. But - it is an aspect > I care about a lot. And those benchmarks match my use-case pretty > good. indeed. I'm even more impressed :) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists