linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1ImK2o-0008IJ-Ur@faramir.fjphome.nl>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 03:07:58 +0100
From:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc1-git4: Reported regressions from 2.6.23

David Miller wrote:
>
>> Subject        : Settings to /proc/sys/net/ipv[46]/conf/all are
>> not propagated. via sysctl too
>> Submitter     : Serge van den Boom <svdb+linux-kernel-bugs@...ck.nl>
>> References    : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9224
>> Handled-By    : Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
>
> I am to understand, from a reply from Herbert Xu, that this issue has
> existed a long time, definitely since before 2.6.22, therefore it
> doesn't belong on the regression list.

I'm fairly sure that this originates with 2.6.21 as it looks very similar to
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8519
which I filed at that time and which I traced to 8030f54499925d07.

I've never been convinced that that change was correct, but as it now "works
for me" due to changes in the Debian default configuration files, I decided
to not follow up.

Of course, not honoring 'all' is more obviously a bug than not honoring
'default' for existing interfaces.

I've added a comment to #8519.

Hope this helps,
Frans Pop
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/