lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0710281957470.28636@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2007 19:59:27 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
cc:	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 08/10] SLUB: Optional fast path using cmpxchg_local

On Sun, 28 Oct 2007, Pekka J Enberg wrote:

> Can you please write a comment of the locking rules when cmpxchg_local() 
> is used? Looks as if we could push that local_irq_save() to slub_lock() 
> and local_irq_restore() to slub_unlock() and deal with the unused flags 
> variable for the non-CONFIG_FAST_CMPXCHG_LOCAL case with a macro, no?

Hmmmm... Maybe .. The locking rules are not changed at all by this patch. 
The cmpxchg_local is only used for the per cpu object list. The per cpu 
slabs are frozen.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ