linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:12:10 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: linux/interrupt.h doesn't need sched.h

On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 11:45:39AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
> +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>  #include <linux/cpumask.h>
>  #include <linux/irqreturn.h>
>  #include <linux/hardirq.h>
> -#include <linux/sched.h>
>  #include <linux/irqflags.h>
>  #include <asm/atomic.h>
>  #include <asm/ptrace.h>

ACK the part that nothing needs sched.h, but it shouldn't change anything,
because of interrupt.h => hardirq.h => smp_lock.h => sched.h dependency.

[puts patch on cross-compile farm anyway]
[starts finding scalpels]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/