[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071029223600.GA21296@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:36:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, --cc@...hat.com,
avi@...amnet.com, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use
> > values around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use
> > 500.
> >
> > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which
> > suggests that 499 would be a limit on the rating values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists