[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071029232140.GA10518@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:21:40 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@...are.com>,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>,
kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glauber@....localdomain>,
Dan Hecht <dhecht@...are.com>,
Garrett Smith <garrett@...are.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > that's totally broken then. You cannot create an SMP-safe monotonic
> > clocksource via interpolation - native does not do it either. Good thing
> > this problem got exposed, it needs to be fixed.
> >
>
> Sigh, I don't really want to have this fight again.
i dont remember us having discussed this before, ever. If there's any
"fight" about monotonicity and SMP then it would be a pretty onesided
affair, with you being beaten up seriously ;-)
> I don't really see what point there is in raising the tsc's rating
> (why is 300 insufficient again?), but regardless of the value, the Xen
> clocksource rating needs to be higher.
anyway, i agree that this patch cannot go in in its current form.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists