[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071030091345.GA23268@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 07:13:45 -0200
From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Prasanna S Panchamukhi <prasanna@...ibm.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <pzijlstr@...hat.com>,
Philippe Elie <phil.el@...adoo.fr>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"William L. Irwin" <wli@...omorphy.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Christoph Lameter <christoph@...eter.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Subject: Re: [RFC] Create instrumentation directory (git repository)
Em Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 07:35:15PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers escreveu:
> I see no good reason to have so many different adhoc instrumentation
> mechanisms for profiling (sched, vm, oprofile) and tracing (blktrace,
> suspend/resume tracing) all over the place. Merging them in a single
> directory seems like a good step towards a more generic
> instrumentation/profiling/tracing infrastructure.
>
> Back to "profile" and "probes" directory names, they might be short, but
> they do not represent the whole markup-profiling-tracing trio,
> "profile" lacks the tracing part and "probe" lacks the markup part.
i14m
hooks
8)
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists