lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20071030131032.GA32366@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:10:32 +0000 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Subject: Re: 32bit builds on x86-64 host. On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:07:08PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > >Before the arch merge, I frequently would test 32bit compiles > >by doing make ARCH=i386 {bzImage/modules/file.o} > > > >Since commit 47572387d58a9584c60ebbbdee56fc92c627f16f > >how does one do this? > > > > make ARCH=i386 {bzImage/modules/file.o} Which seems rather unnatural to me. All other merge architectures have ARCH=<archdir> where archdir is the name under arch, e.g. mips, powerpc, s390. They then have a CONFIG_FOO_64 and set the utsname and -m32/-m64 respectively. It would be nice if x86 could behave like all other architectures in this respect. Especially as the behaviour of the other architectures is a lot more intuitive. > > Amazing, isn't it? > > -hpa > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ ---end quoted text--- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists