[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710301558.31443.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:58:31 +0000
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Chandramouli Narayanan <mouli@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 -v5] x86_64 EFI runtime service support: EFI runtime services
On Tuesday 30 October 2007 05:55, Huang, Ying wrote:
> +static inline unsigned long native_get_wallclock(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long retval;
> +
> + if (efi_enabled)
> + retval = efi_get_time();
> + else
> + retval = mach_get_cmos_time();
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
mach_get_cmos_time() is itself an inline, and a _large_ one
(~20 LOC with macro and function calls).
efi_get_time() is an inline too, although strange one:
it is declared inline *only* in efi.c file:
inline unsigned long efi_get_time(void)
(yes, just inline, not static/extern),
while efi.h has normal extern for it:
extern unsigned long efi_get_time(void);
Is it supposed to be like that?
> +static inline int native_set_wallclock(unsigned long nowtime)
> +{
> + int retval;
> +
> + if (efi_enabled)
> + retval = efi_set_rtc_mmss(nowtime);
> + else
> + retval = mach_set_rtc_mmss(nowtime);
> +
> + return retval;
> +}
Same here, only mach_set_rtc_mmss is 50 LOC, not 20.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists