| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200710301339.23628.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:39:23 +1100 From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Cc: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>, --cc@...hat.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, avi@...amnet.com, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] raise tsc clocksource rating On Tuesday 30 October 2007 09:17:38 Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote: > > CC'ed John and removed glauber@....localdomain :) > > > From: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <glauber@....localdomain> > > > > tsc is very good time source (when it does not have drifts, does not > > change it's frequency, i.e. when it works), so it should have its rating > > raised to a value greater than, or equal 400. > > > > Since it's being a tendency among paravirt clocksources to use values > > around 400, we should declare tsc as even better: So we use 500. > > > > This patch also touches the comments on clocksource.h, which suggests > > that 499 would be a limit on the rating values. > > > > Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> > > Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> No. tsc is very good, it's not perfect. If a paravirt clock registers 400 it really means "pick me over the tsc". That's *why* they use > 400: it's in the documentation. Rusty. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists