| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200710302127.10841.ak@suse.de> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:27:10 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de> To: Paul Jackson <pj@....com> Cc: Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, rientjes@...gle.com, clameter@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] cpusets: add interleave_over_allowed option On Tuesday 30 October 2007 20:47:51 Paul Jackson wrote: > Andi, Christoph, or whomever: > > Are there any good regression tests of mempolicy functionality? numactl has some basic tests (make test). I think newer LTP also has some but i haven't looked at them. And there is Lee's memtoy which does some things; but I don't think it's very automated. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists